Preliminary Investigations of Cell Com Curative
Potency
S. Danev1, E. Datzov2,
M. Hristova3, M. Svetoslavova4
Introduction
Since the Cell Com system by Hugo Nielsen was
introduced some years ago, the device has received little any
attention from the "official" medical authorities. In
the same period of time the curative practice with Cell Com and
the positive results achieved (1, 2, 3, 4) make conceivable the
usefulness of this method for treatment of a large number of
diseases even including various types of cancer.
The aim of the present study was in a crossover
trial to investigate whether para-clinical or clinical improvement
could be observed in four groups of patients, treated for about 60
days with Cell Com.
Theoretical background of Cell Com
Probably no single explanation can account for
Cell Com´s curative abilities. One possible explanation could
very well be, that the effect is mediated via the improvement of
the electromagnetic balance of the skin. Thus, the very act of
connecting two symmetric points of the body surface with the
sensors of Cell Com in the "measure" phase may minimize
a pathological increased electromagnetic misbalance between the
points and that Cell Com in the "treatment" phase
reverse the pathological electromagnetic pattern towards normal.
Recent investigations have thrown light on the
ability of the skin - via specific channels, including the
electromagnetic ones - to mirror the overall "health
state" of a person and its pathological deviations.
Experiments have thus revealed that the electromagnetic fields on
the body surface are much stronger than those born by the
electrochemical generators of the intern body structures. This is
due to the specific ability of the horny layer of the epidermis to
accumulate quasistatic electricity because its electrical
resistance is extremely high, ranging from 3 to at least 25 MW .
In accordance with the dermal dielectric resistance, the static
electricity under normal circumstances very slowly (10sec to
15min) diffuses to the depth of the body. This diffusion
presumably disturbs the skin�s possibility to transmit
biological information from the surrounding nature to the intern
structures of the body. Cell Com is decreasing the level of static
electricity in a very specific way, thereby facilitating the
exchange of biological important information. The process is
probably based on the properties of the s. c. "ultra weak
bio-photon emission". This emission, first discovered by
Gurwitch in 1923 (5), was called "mitogenetic
radiation". Previously bio-photon emission was not widely
accepted by the mainstream scientists (6), but scientists have
since without doubt proved its existence. Its origin was,
moreover, proved from investigations with chemoluminescence,
bioluminescence, fluorescence and super-fluorescence (7, 8). From
the latest achievements in the field of biophysics, life and
"health quality" of life are electromagnetic based
phenomenon's, which can be electromagnetic modulated (9, 10, 11).
It is thus a very good presumption, that pathological processes
may have their origins in the deterioration of the body�s
electromagnetic balance.
These considerations lead us to the conception,
that Cell Com in some way may facilitate the electromagnetic and
sub-electromagnetic levels of bio-informational exchange because
skin is one of the main pathways connecting the body with its
surrounding universe.
In the "measure" phase (first step)
Cell Com is reflecting the bio-electric potential lack of balance
between two maximal distant skin points (e.g. the. acupoints Gall
Bladder 44). We do not know if (or how) this information
influences the second phase "treatment", but undoubtedly
the phase enables the body to establish a new bio-magnetic
"comfort" by facilitating bio-electrical communication.
The process is dependant on the local blood supply (constriction
or dilatation of pre-capillary sphincters), and thus the degree of
ion diffusion. Living systems are, as a matter of fact, colloidal
system i.e. a zol with equally spread electrical charges. Even a
weak electrical impulse (fx. the accumulated quasistatic
electricity) can deteriorate the equilibrium of the bio-electrical
colloidal charge, and by this way change vitally important
bio-constants. Cell Com is decreasing the electromagnetic
imbalance between left and right body parts in the measuring
phase, acting as a short circuit. Thus, in the phase of treatment
it is likely that Cell Com is preparing the biological system for
an enhanced effect of traditional medication, as well as
increasing the endogenous quantum energy based self-healing bodily
capacity.
Preliminary hypothesis
In accordance with the supposed theoretical
basis for Cell Com, the preliminary hypothesis of the
investigation was to establish whether the effect of orthodox
therapies could be enhanced by simultaneous treatment with Cell
Com.
Experimental design
In order to prove or to reject the preliminary
hypothesis, four experimental studies were set up. In Study 1, 2
and 3 the enrolled subjects (in- and outpatients) were divided
into two groups � experimental and control. The subjects from
both groups were treated with well-accepted routine medicaments.
The experimental group was treated with Cell Com for 2 months. The
Control group was likewise treated with Cell Com but adjusted to
"off position" (the electrical resistance between the
two electrodes is in this case 800 kW , compared to 20W in the
"treatment phase"). In Study 4 all enrolled in-patients
were in the experimental group i.e. treated with Cell Com.
Material and methods
Subjects
-
Study 1. 31 patients with hypertension
(HT), selected according to WHO criteria for hypertension (SBP
> 140mmHg, DBP > 90mmHg) (borderline, 1st, 2nd
and 3rd stage of morbus hypertonicus, 14 men and 17
woman).
-
Study 2. 11 patients with classical or
definite rheumatoid arthritis (RH), selected according to the
criteria of American Rheumatism Association (5 men and 6 woman).
-
Study 3. 20 patients with right camera
hypertrophy (cor pulmonum (CP), (10 men and 10 woman);
-
Study 4. 5 cancer patients (CA) with
histologic well proved malignancy, all of them after 1, 2 or 3
operative interventions for CA or metastasis ectomy, some of
them in status post chemotherapy, prognosis pessima, because of
new pathological formations (metastasis) in pelvis, peritoneum,
hepar, columna vertebralis or brain areas, according to
ultrasound or scanning diagnosis (original diagnosis: Ca recti
(1), Ca ovarii (2), Ca coli uteri (1), Ca corposis uteri (1).
All participants gave informed consent and the
study was approved by a formal Ethics Commission.
Cell Com treatment
Cell Com was applied once daily for 10 to 20 min. (Study 1, 2
and 3) and 3 times daily for 10 min. (Study 4) according to the
procedure prescribed by Nielsen (1) using gall bladder point 44 on
both feet.
Parameters
Blood pressure was measured according Korotkow
in Torr. Heart rate, physical and mental stress were determined
from heart rate variability (time and frequency domain variables)
according to Danev (12), clinical improvement or aggravation was
graded on a 5 point scale: 5 = moderate improvement, 4 = mild
improvement, 3 = no changes, 2 = slight aggravation, 1 = obvious
aggravation, (for RA patients reduction of pain at day and at
night, morning stiffness, consumption of analgesics as well as
other clinical variables were taken into account; for Ca patients:
self estimation of the quality of life or instrumental
investigation), blood serum levels of Zinc and Selenium were
determined by atomic absorption flame spectrophotometry (AAS),
using Perkin�Elmer 3030, the determination of other para-clinical
variables was carried out according to commonly accepted
procedures.
Procedure
All variables were measured in the beginning
and at the end of the study, which lasted about 60 days. All
previous or new therapy was left unchanged. Subjects were taking
their normal diets; tobacco and coffee were not prohibited during
the trial. Control groups in these single blind experiments were
used in order to eliminate a potential Cell Com induced placebo
effect.
Results
The obtained results in different studies are presented
separately.
Study 1
The hypertension persons followed (morbus
hypertonicus, hypertonia essentialis) were predominantly
out-clinic patients from internal medicine and cardiology. None of
the patients had other illnesses as a main reason for
hypertension. 37 % of the persons were with transitory
hypertension (I.st stage or borderline hypertension), 43 % were
with moderate organic deterioration's as myocardial hypertrophy,
vasoconstriction of retinal artery, oedema papillae, thrombosis of
retinal venae, Guist symptom, left camera insuficencia etc. (II-nd
and III-rd stage, according to WHO classification � 1978). Some
of the subjects were not medically well examined. Only one of the
subjects suffered from m. hypertonicus for a period less than 1
year. No cases with malignant hypertension were observed. All
persons were already treated for more than 6 months with
beta-blockers (Obridan, Visken, Trasicor, Sectral etc.), diuretics
(Saluretin, Dehydratin � Neo, Diuretidin), Calcium - antagonists
(Corinfar, Nifedepinum) or with other antihypertensive tools as
Chlofazolin, alfa�Metyldopa, Reserpin, Captoril, Enalapril, or
with Gopten (AC inhibitor).
The Study was preceded by consultation with a
highly skilled specialist in hypertension, who for every of the
participant prescribed an optimal strategy for treatment during
the trial including a variety of health promoting procedures.
The preliminary expectation was, that the
optimal treatment would result in a decrease of SBB, DBP and
probably of Physical or Mental Stress. It was moreover anticipated
that this effect would be better expressed in experimental group
compared to the control group.
The obtained results are presented in table 1.
The data in table 1 confirm our preliminary
expectations. Thus, both groups show a decrease of SBP and DBP,
but the decrease has a higher degree of statistical significance
in the experimental group compared to the control group. Same
tendency is the case for Physical- and Mental Stress.
Study 2
It is well known the rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
has an unknown etiology. This was the main idea for approving that
RA patients (from our rheumatoid clinics) could be included in the
investigation with Cell Com.
It was, however, rather challenging to
start such a type of investigation because we neither knew the
main cause of this systemic autoimmune disorder, nor how Cell Com
is acting in details. Would it or would it not be effective in
this particular disease? The main part of the patients - being
treated for years without remarkable improvements - was very
skeptical towards Cell Com treatment, a fact excluding a possible
extraordinary placebo effect. Despite this and also to insure
significance, a control group was used as in Study 1.
Eleven patients with confirmed RA (criteria of
the American Rheumatism Association, ARA) were included in the
investigation. Their inflammatory activity was mostly low or
moderate. Functionally 4 persons belonged to class I (ARA
criteria) and the other 7 to class II. All persons were taking
non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs as: Acetylsal, Indomethacin,
Naproxen, Ibuprofen, Butazone, Voltaren (Feloran). Some were
treated with slowly acting antirheumatoidal drugs as Arthrochin,
Solganol � B - oleosum, Cuprenil (D � penicillamin). One was
ahead of inclusion treated with the immune-suppressor Imuran (Azathioprin).
Three persons were treated with the corticosteroids Prednison or
Prednisolon. Chloroquine and Salicylazosulphapyridine were also
used in the past according to their medical charts.
Despite varying length of remissions, all
patients had in the beginning of the investigation clinical
exacerbation and have been seen by our rheumatologist in order to
optimize the ordinary treatment strategy. We, therefore, expected
that clinical as well as paraclinical improvement during the
course of the study would be better expressed in the experimental
group compared to the control group.
The obtained results are presented in Table 2.
As can be seen from this table, the followed
variables for quantifying and comparing the level of inflammatory
activity in the course of the treatment, show higher degree of
optimal values in the experimental group compared to the control
group, confirming our preliminary hypothesis.
Variables such as Weltman, immunoglobulines,
ESR and WBC, as reactants for monitoring the effect of
anti-inflammatory process should be looked further into.
Study 3
20 patients with COPI (chronic obstructive
pulmonal illness), leading to "cor pulmonum" were
enroled in this study. The majority was in-patients of the
cardiology or pulmonology clinics and was treated with Enalapril
(AC inhibitor).
The main pharmaco-kinetic effect of Enapril was
expected to be on the pulmonal arterioles.
The levels of the arterial and pulmonal blood
pressures, the diameter and the wall (in mm) of the right camera
were controlled by Doppler-cardiography. The main causes for COPI
were: asthma bronchiale � 6 cases, chronic bronchitis or
pneumonia bilateralis � 9 cases, emphysema pulmonum � 2 cases,
kyfoscoliosis � 1 case, pneumosclerosis and obesity. All
patients had additional accompanying COPI illness as: Morbus
hypertonicus, ulcerosis, diabetes, Ca plv., Urinariae, chronical
cystitis, etc. Their preliminary treatment was predominantly with
inhalations with Isodenit, Salbutamol or Nouphyllin.
The obtained results are presented in table 3.
The obtained results support the preliminary
stated hypothesis. Almost all of the variables followed show
improvement in both groups, with the level of significance higher
in the experimental one.
Study 4.
In Study 4 cancer patients were treated with
Cell Com between 50 to 60 days, 3 times daily. No control group
was separated. In this respect Study 4 may be regarded as a pilot
Study.
The number of patients in the group was not
increased during the trial for two reasons. Firstly because the
psychological climate around these patients was so complicated,
that we did not want to take the risk that Cell Com treatment in
any way could be connected with a possible deterioration of the
patients state (complaints). Secondly because treating such
patients 3 times daily was quite time consuming and could be an
emotional loaded procedure. The patients were all with a terminal
prognosis and not all aware of their real chances to survive. The
patients were not promised that Cell Com could cure them
completely, but only, that the procedure might increase their
overall vital force, and that this fact was already scientifically
proved.
The obtained results are presented in table 4.
The table indicate that none of the followed-up
variables show remarkable deterioration, as would otherwise be
expected without Cell Com treatment. Contrary, clinical data, TFK,
RBC, HT, ESR and Mental stress even improved although only Mental
Stress significantly.
Discussion
A controlled study on the effects of using Cell
Com on patients with morbus hypertonicus, rheumatoid arthritis and
COPI has to our knowledge not previously been carried out. During
the period of Cell Com treatment the followed variables of the
majority of the patients from the experimental groups improved to
a higher degree of significance than those from the control
groups. Hence, since no adverse effects of Cell Com were observed,
it can be suggested that Cell Com may induce a better effect of
treatment with traditional medicaments and by this way enhance a
more rapid clinical improvement in patients with illnesses
difficult to treat by contemporary medical strategies. Further
investigations are needed to establish the long-term effects of
Cell Com in order to identify the variables most sensitive to Cell
Com and the optimal time course of treatment. Since the clinical
improvement is the most important effect of Cell Com, it was
expected, that the patients who showed the greatest improvement in
their clinical status generally also would be those, who showed
the greatest improvement in para-clinical variables. This was,
however, not always the case. Nevertheless, our findings indicate,
in agreement with the previously posed hypothesis, that Cell Com
brings temporary (we do not know how long this effect persists)
clinical and para-clinical benefit when it is coupled with other
routine methods of therapy. The most striking effects were the
obviously reduced feeling of pain and stiffness, reported by most
RA patients, as well as, the generally improved (beyond normal
expectation) quality of life in Ca patients (taken as a whole).
The higher level of statistical significance between mean values
in the experimental groups strengthened this impression. The
smaller effect of treatment with Cell Com on the control groups
may be due to the fact, that Cell Com in the "measure
phase" do exert some effect on the EM of the skin and in
addition that pressure with the electrodes on the acupuncture
points known from ancient Chinese literature may have an effect.
The experimental design rules out the
possibility that this fact may be a placebo effect, neither to be
a consequence of not sufficiently "pure"
experimentation. To execute an absolutely "clean"
experimentation is, as a matter of fact, impossible, but as well
as we made all possible effort to decrease the level of the
experimental "noise", our results in general do not
contradict, but strongly support the postulation, that Cell Com is
making the biological system more "open" or
"fertile" to other medical treatments. We believe, that
our findings are of interest not only for the use of Cell Com in
general routine medical practice, but also for a better
understanding of "quality of health". Cell Com may be a
device indispensable for evaluating optimal conditions for
bio-information exchange. The results suggest that Cell Com is
facilitating the process of bio-information exchange executed via
the sc. endogenous (internal) EM fields and by this way is
promoting body�s self-healing capabilities. The idea, that local
EM fields (normally easy to be directly registered) may be a
subset of a global bio-energy field, (being a corner stone of
"quality health") has recently become very popular in
the field of energy medicine. It is suggested, that changes in
this field are preceding and regulating all bodily biochemical
processes. This way early diagnosis and treatment of diseases can
be achieved by normalizing lack of equilibrium of the bioenergy
field (13). This author brings scientific evidence, that this
bio-energy field is functioning "more at the quantum level
than at the classical level (like EM fields)". Furthermore,
this field is "coherent in nature and quantified", which
enables the biological systems to function at the quantum level, a
level strongly facilitating bioinformational exchange. G. Smith
(13) introduces the concept of Quantum Energy Healing Model, in
which the role and effect of Cell Com can be very intriguing. From
an electronic point of view, Cell Com seems to be a rather simple
device, but introduced bilaterally and on certain points it is
probably acting to improve the structure of the bio-energetic
balance.
Conclusion
The results obtained in Study 1, 2, 3 and 4 support our
above postulation, that Cell Com treatment improves the sc. Common
Functional Status and in this way may enhance the curative effect
of a large class of orthodox medicaments. We, therefore, strongly
recommend that Cell Com treatment alone should be used only where
its effect is well documented. In all other cases Cell Com
treatment should be carried out predominantly in addition to
well-accepted traditional medical strategies, thereby increasing
the potency of their curative effect as a compounding factor, and
may be decreasing use of medicaments/chemicals all of which has
some more or less serious side effects.
References
- H. Nielsen, Cell Com system (1998), Randheym Trykk, Drammen,
Norway
- S. Danev (1998), Klinishe Anwendung von Cell Com bei 42
Migraine-Patienten, Journal Fachmagazin für Natur-Heilkunde,
N3, Marz
- H. Nielsen, S. Danev (1997), Improvement of Common Functional
Status in cancer patients by Hugo Nielsen�s curative system,
Proceeding on III-rd World Congress of Cancer, Australia
- S. Danev, H. Nielsen (1998), Quantum energy healing model �
some new experimental supports, Proceeding on Annual Congress of
International Medical Association "Bulgaria", Varna,
Bulgaria
- A.G. Gurwitsch (1923), Die Natur des spezifischen Etterers
der Zellteilung. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie und
Entwicklungsmechanik, vol. 100, 11-40
- A. Kohn (1986), False Prophets: Fraud and Error in Science
and Medicine, Blackwell, Oxford
- F.A. Popp et al.(eds.), (1979), Electromagnetic
Bio-Information, p.123, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore
- J. Slawinski (1988), Experientia 44, 559
- M. Barinaga (1992), "Giving personal magnetism a whole
new meaning", Science, 256, 967
- C.W. Smith (1994), "Electromagnetic and
Bio-information and Water", In Ultra High Dilutions:
Physics and Physiology Endler (eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers
- V. I. Kurassen (1989), Magnetic Treatment of Water, Moscow,
Russia: Nisso Tsuushinsha
- S. Danev (1997), Heart Rate Variability in Medical Practice,
Proc. of IMAB, vol.3, 281-284.
- G. Rein (1998), Biological Effects of Quantum Fields and
Their Role in the Natural Healing Process, Frontier
Perspectives, vol.7, N1.
|
Parameter
|
SBP (Torr) |
DBP (Torr) |
Physiologic Stress (a.u.) |
Mental Stress (a.u.) |
|
Period |
before |
after |
before |
after |
before |
After |
before |
after |
|
Experimental Group Cell Com:
"On" position (N=15, 8 men, 7 women) |
|
Mean value |
178 |
157 |
133 |
119 |
2,82 |
0,91 |
2,56 |
1,1 |
|
Variance |
191 |
204 |
322 |
325 |
3,42 |
4,9 |
3,89 |
3,85 |
|
ANOVA (p) |
0,0003 |
0,05 |
0,01 |
0,05 |
|
Control Group Cell Com:
"Off" position (N=16, 10 men, 6 women) |
|
Mean value |
172 |
152 |
127 |
118 |
2,00 |
0,83 |
1,85 |
1,11 |
|
Variance |
267 |
298 |
199 |
175 |
2,56 |
4,31 |
2,13 |
2,34 |
|
ANOVA (p) |
0,0006 |
0,07 (ns) |
0,08 (ns) |
0,16 (ns) |
Table 1 Mean values and variance from 31
patients with Hypertension
(Mean age: Experimental Group 54,6 years; Control Group 58,5
years)
a.u.: arbitrary units; ns: no significance
Table 2 Mean values and variance from 11
patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
(Mean age: Experimental Group 44,6 years;
Control Group 46 years)
|
Parameter |
Clinical status (a.u.) |
Fe
(mmol/l) |
Zn
(mmol/l) |
Weltman
(Epr) |
IgG
(g/l) |
IgA
(g/l) |
IgM
(g/l) |
ESR
(mm/hr) |
Compl.fr. C4
(g/l) |
WBC
(103 / mm3) |
|
Period |
be |
Af |
be |
af |
be |
af |
be |
af |
be |
af |
be |
af |
be |
Af |
be |
af |
Be |
af |
be |
af |
|
be |
af |
|
Experimental Group Cell Com:
"On" position (N=6, 2 men, 4 women) |
|
Mean value |
3,0 |
4,1 |
8,96 |
12,0 |
9,66 |
11,23 |
3,5 |
4,83 |
18,5 |
15,0 |
4,31 |
2,55 |
2,98 |
1,71 |
61 |
42 |
0,19 |
0,15 |
6,46 |
5,208 |
|
Variance |
0 |
4,1 |
8,96 |
12,0 |
9,66 |
11,23 |
3,5 |
4,83 |
18,5 |
15,0 |
4,31 |
2,55 |
2,98 |
1,71 |
61,0 |
42,1 |
0,19 |
1,15 |
6,46 |
5,28 |
|
ANOVA
(p) |
0,003 |
0,24 (ns) |
0,43 (ns) |
0,04 |
0,006 |
0,03 |
0,001 |
0,01 |
0,03 |
0,002 |
|
Control Group Cell Com: "Off"
position (N=5. 3 men 2 women) |
|
Mean value |
3,0 |
3,4 |
12,1 |
12,4 |
12,8 |
12,3 |
3,8 |
4,8 |
15,6 |
13,0 |
4,0 |
3,14 |
2,7 |
2,16 |
49,6 |
42,2 |
0,17 |
0,12 |
5,84 |
5,3 |
|
Variance |
0 |
0,3 |
12,6 |
6,31 |
3,81 |
1,34 |
1,7 |
1,2 |
10,8 |
7,5 |
1,01 |
1,0 |
0,07 |
0,07 |
46,8 |
44,7 |
0 |
0 |
0,27 |
0,26 |
|
ANOVA
(p) |
0,14 (ns) |
0,88 (ns) |
0,64 (ns) |
0,22 (ns) |
0,21 (ns) |
0,21 (ns) |
0,01 |
0,12 (ns) |
0,001 |
0,13 (ns) |
a.u.: arbitrary units; ns: no significance
Tabel 3 Mean values and variance from 20
patients with symptoms of Cor Pulmonum
(Mean age: Experimental Group 57,2
years; Control Group 51,3 years)
|
Parameter |
Pulse (beats/min) |
SAP (Torr) |
DAP (Torr) |
DRC (mm) |
WRCS (mm) |
PAP (Torr) |
|
Period |
before |
after |
Before |
After |
before |
after |
before |
after |
Before |
after |
before |
after |
|
. Experimental Group Cell Com:
"On" position (N=10, 5 men , 5 women 5) |
|
Mean value |
94,6 |
82,6 |
132 |
116 |
84,0 |
74,4 |
33,4 |
27,5 |
7,67 |
6,37 |
39,4 |
33,7 |
|
Variance |
16,9 |
7,15 |
29,6 |
28,0 |
26,6 |
33,6 |
6,01 |
1,57 |
0,75 |
0,60 |
14,0 |
13,5 |
|
ANOVA (p) |
0.0000003 |
0,000004 |
0,001 |
0,000002 |
0,002 |
0,002 |
|
Control Group Cell Com: "Off"
position (N=10, 5 men, 5 women) |
|
Mean value |
92,1 |
86,0 |
147 |
129 |
100 |
82,2 |
31,8 |
27,8 |
7,16 |
6,49 |
39,5 |
35,6 |
|
Variance |
6,76 |
5,55 |
137 |
115 |
102 |
37,7 |
15 |
5,03 |
0,63 |
0,35 |
10,9 |
12 |
|
ANOVA (p) |
0,00003 |
0,001 |
0,004 |
0,009 |
0,04 |
0,01 |
Table 4. Individuel experimental results, mean group values and
variance from 5 cancer patients, (all women), investigated before
and after treatment with Cell Com (correct) for a period of two
months.
a.u.: arbitrary units; ns: no significance
|
Patient No & (Age) |
1(56) |
2(73) |
3(59) |
4(64) |
5(57) |
Mean(X) |
Variance |
Anova (p) |
|
Parameter |
Unit |
Period |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Before |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
After |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3,2 |
0,7 |
|
Before |
2,55 |
2,18 |
2,34 |
2,07 |
2,48 |
2,32 |
0,04 |
|
After |
2,49 |
2,09 |
2,26 |
2,12 |
2,68 |
2,32 |
0,06 |
|
Before |
0,75 |
0,73 |
0,69 |
0,92 |
1,0 |
0,81 |
0,01 |
|
After |
0,66 |
0,84 |
0,72 |
0,84 |
1,12 |
0,83 |
0,03 |
|
Before |
4,0 |
6,3 |
5,1 |
8,3 |
12,4 |
7,22 |
10,92 |
|
After |
5,8 |
7,2 |
4,9 |
9,6 |
13,3 |
8,16 |
11,4 |
|
Before |
42,0 |
44,0 |
41,8 |
59,3 |
49,4 |
47,3 |
54,4 |
|
After |
50,1 |
51,0 |
56,6 |
62,6 |
58,5 |
55,7 |
27,4 |
|
Before |
27,0 |
24,6 |
18,9 |
28,3 |
25,6 |
24,8 |
13,13 |
|
After |
26,7 |
20,8 |
19,1 |
22,2 |
23,9 |
22,5 |
8,53 |
|
Before |
1112 |
729 |
952 |
426 |
518 |
747 |
82763 |
|
After |
1060 |
913 |
1104 |
504 |
693 |
854 |
64208 |
|
Before |
11,7 |
12,4 |
8,6 |
12,2 |
10,5 |
11 |
2,46 |
|
After |
11,9 |
12,1 |
9,3 |
13,0 |
10,0 |
11,2 |
2,39 |
|
Before |
4,7 |
5,6 |
6,3 |
5,8 |
6,2 |
5,72 |
0,4 |
|
After |
7,1 |
4,9 |
7,0 |
6,1 |
4,9 |
6,0 |
1,16 |
|
Before |
2,8 |
3,2 |
2,9 |
3,7 |
2,3 |
2,98 |
0,26 |
|
After |
3,98 |
4,1 |
3,1 |
3,3 |
2,9 |
3,47 |
0,28 |
|
Before |
9,1 |
11,3 |
12,1 |
9,7 |
11,5 |
10,7 |
1,02 |
|
After |
10,3 |
12,6 |
11,2 |
9,4 |
12,8 |
11,2 |
2,13 |
|
Before |
24,4 |
26,3 |
22,9 |
34,1 |
28,4 |
27,2 |
19,04 |
|
After |
33,6 |
27,3 |
35,2 |
39,2 |
27,2 |
32,5 |
27,13 |
|
Before |
85 |
89 |
83 |
80 |
78 |
83 |
18,5 |
|
After |
84 |
87 |
87 |
84 |
81 |
84,6 |
6,3 |
|
Before |
32 |
27 |
32 |
29 |
30 |
29,9 |
4,21 |
|
After |
26 |
31 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
29,9 |
5,73 |
|
Before |
332 |
324 |
343 |
321 |
316 |
327 |
111 |
|
After |
307 |
341 |
338 |
340 |
323 |
329 |
215 |
|
Before |
237 |
270 |
158 |
260 |
314 |
247 |
3301 |
|
After |
349 |
342 |
143 |
283 |
296 |
282 |
6901 |
|
Before |
93 |
44 |
56 |
78 |
49 |
64 |
431 |
|
After |
81 |
36 |
30 |
51 |
33 |
46.2 |
443 |
|
Before |
97 |
89 |
96 |
102 |
87 |
94,2 |
37,7 |
|
After |
93 |
82 |
85 |
94 |
83 |
87,4 |
32,3 |
|
Before |
13,6 |
8,3 |
6,8 |
11,4 |
7,7 |
9,56 |
8,09 |
|
After |
13,4 |
6,2 |
6,1 |
10,1 |
6,3 |
8,42 |
10,6 |
|
Before |
3,27 |
4,8 |
7,2 |
3,3 |
5,5 |
4,81 |
2,7 |
|
After |
1,6 |
2,3 |
3,6 |
0,9 |
1,6 |
1,99 |
1,04 |
|