|
AFGHANISTAN: ANALYSTS SAY SOME NEIGHBORS
INTERFERING IN KABUL’S INTERNAL AFFAIRS Ron Synovitz:
2/09/03 A EurasiaNet Partner Post from RFE/RL
The British group that publishes "Jane’s Defense Weekly"
says Afghanistan is facing "pressure and interference" from
its neighbors and other nearby countries.
The report by researcher Akram Gizabi was released this
month by "Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst." Gizabi says four
countries that actively tried to shape the affairs of
Afghanistan during the past three decades -- Pakistan, Russia,
Iran, and Uzbekistan -- are now on the scene again to varying
degrees. And he warns that some countries have questionable
intentions in Afghanistan.
Other experts agree with Gizabi’s assessment. Among them is
Christopher Langton, head of defense analysis at the
International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. He
told RFE/RL: "This, to my mind, is one of the most disturbing
things about the emerging situation in Afghanistan. The
[nearby] powers -- Russia, Pakistan and Iran, in particular --
are now seeking to re-establish their influence in Afghanistan
in a very partisan fashion. That, to most people’s minds,
cannot bode well for the future unity of Afghanistan, which
[Transitional Authority President] Hamid Karzai, [UN special
envoy] Lakhdar Brahimi, and the United Nations are trying to
build."
Out of all of Afghanistan’s neighbors, Gizabi says Pakistan
is responsible for most of the interference. The degree of
involvement by Pakistan’s government, rather than radical
groups or individuals within the country, is an issue that
analysts are still debating. That’s because Pakistan
officially is an ally in the U.S.-led antiterrorism campaign.
But Gizabi maintains that Pakistan’s intelligence service,
the ISI, is now directly supporting the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and
renegade Afghan commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who is thought
to be hiding in Pakistan’s autonomous tribal regions.
Reports of Pakistani agents working against Karzai and the
United States are nothing new to Afghans. Last September,
after a deadly bomb attack in a Kabul market, Karzai accused
Pakistan of sheltering and helping Hekmatyar.
There also has been a recent upsurge of border clashes and
reported infiltrations into Afghanistan by militants thought
to have sheltered in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province
and Baluchistan -- two provinces where pro-Taliban politicians
recently won local elections.
U.S. military spokesman Roger King said former Taliban and
Al-Qaeda fighters appear to have regrouped and aligned
themselves with Hekmatyar and his declared holy war against
the United States and the Afghan central government.
King said those fighters are thought to have been involved
in a fierce battle against U.S. troops last month in Kandahar
Province near the Spin Boldak border crossing with Pakistan.
"Our intelligence leads us to believe that they are most
closely aligned with [former Afghan Prime Minister Gulbuddin
Hekmatyar’s] Hizb-e Islami movement, which is Hekmatyar’s
military arm. We’ve had reports over the last several months
that he’s been attempting to consolidate with remnants of
Al-Qaeda and Taliban. So they would all go under the heading
of enemy forces -- anti-coalition forces. But that’s who we
believe they are," he said.
A few days after that battle, when it became apparent most
of the fighters had escaped, 18 Afghan civilians were killed
by a freshly laid land mine on the outskirts of Kandahar.
Kandahar Mayor Abdullah Popal told a memorial ceremony for
the victims this week that elements in "neighboring countries"
don’t want peace and security in Afghanistan.
Kandahar’s security chief, General Khan Mohammad
Khakreezwal, told the crowd that Afghanistan’s neighbors are
still trying to gain influence in the country by helping
militants who oppose Karzai. "Now they still don’t want to
leave us alone. We should not be used [as puppets by our
neighbors]. We should not be the cause of destruction -- and
we should work for [the Afghan] people now," he said.
Khakreezwal stressed that the presence of the U.S.-led
coalition in Afghanistan should help the country protect
itself from unwanted foreign interference. "Now there is a
good chance for the Afghan people, with the international
forces in the region, to release Afghanistan from the grip of
these people," he said.
Langton said the growing number of reports about ISI
involvement in Afghanistan does not surprise him. "I think
this is very much part of it. There is very little secret now
about the fact that the I.S.I. are back inside Afghanistan.
And if they are in Afghanistan, then it is not going too far
to say they are talking with the Taliban both in Pakistan and
in Afghanistan," he told RFE/RL.
Langton also said the recent fighting near Spin Boldak has
lent urgency to allegations of Pakistani involvement. "Recent
events in the southern mountains [of Afghanistan] have shown
that the level of attacks, the numbers of attacks, have risen
and that infiltration by the Taliban back into [Afghanistan]
has also increased. And the ISI may be playing a part in that
for traditional, as well as for ethnic, reasons," he said.
Junaid Ahsan, a Karachi-based analyst at the Pakistani
Institute for International Affairs, argues that it would be
imprudent for Pakistan to help the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
"Viewing history, [and the ISI’s support for the rise of the
Taliban during the 1990s], it may be possible that covertly
they now have some relationship or [are providing] shelter.
But officially, and viewing the international and regional
situation, it is not very obvious. And it doesn’t seem
practical that Pakistan should take such a risky step," Ahsan
said.
But Afghan commanders in the southeastern provinces of
Khost and Paktia have been complaining for months about the
ability of Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters to cross freely back
and forth across the border with Pakistan -- sometimes passing
directly through buildings used by Pakistan’s border guards.
Another issue that concerns Gizabi is a $40 million
military helicopter deal reached between Russia and Jamiat-e
Islami, the powerful former Northern Alliance faction headed
by Afghan Defense Minister Mohammad Qasim Fahim. The contract
calls for Russia to provide transport helicopters, gunships,
and spare parts directly to Fahim’s ministry rather than the
Afghan National Army.
Langton said such deals stoke tensions between rival
factional militias that still dominate the regions outside of
Kabul. "Particularly, I would point at the Russian involvement
with Fahim in passing [weapons] on to him, and specifically
not to the Afghan National Army. And what sort of message does
that send given that Fahim has as a protege Mohammad Atta, who
is a deputy governor in [the northern Afghan city of] Mazar-e
Sharif, and the separate coalition up there of the Turks,
Uzbeks, and [General Abdul Rashid] Dostum?"
Langton concluded, "The future, if this trend continues
with these outside powers picking partners in a disunified
fashion, looks rather bleak, to be honest."
Gizabi says Islamist hard-liners in Tehran oppose the
creation of a democratic government in Afghanistan and are
actively trying to destabilize Karzai’s government. He says
Tehran also has given sanctuary to terrorists from Al-Qaeda,
including at least two high-ranking members of its inner
circle.
Iran has provided military aid to the private militia of
Ismail Khan, the governor of the western Afghan province of
Herat. Gizabi says Tehran also is training and financing
militant groups in central and northwestern Afghanistan like
Sepah-e Mohammad and Sepah-e Quds.
In northern Afghanistan, Gizabi says Turkey and Uzbekistan
appear eager to revive their support for General Abdul Rashid
Dostum by strengthening his private militia forces.
Last December, a document signed by Karzai and
Afghanistan’s neighbors called for constructive and supportive
bilateral relations. The so-called Kabul Declaration says
friendly relations should be based on the principles of
territorial integrity, mutual respect, cooperation, and
noninterference in each other’s internal affairs.
But the reality suggested by Afghan experts, Karzai, and
other Afghan officials appears to be at odds with the hopes
expressed in the Kabul Declaration.
Email this
article | Printer-Friendly Version Posted February 9, 2003 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org/index.shtml
 |
 |
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its
website, meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more
informed debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia. It is a
program of the Open Society Institute-New York. The Open
Society Institute-New York is a private operating and
grantmaking foundation that promotes the development of
open societies around the world by supporting
educational, social, and legal reform, and by
encouraging alternative approaches to complex and
controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not
necessarily represent the position of the Open Society
Institute and are the sole responsibility of the author
or authors. |
 |
 | |