             
2005 Journal
2004 journal
2003 journals
2002 journals
2001 journals
|
Journal of a Futurist - 20 April 2005
10 REASONS WHY THE USA IS NOW THE MOST DANGEROUS NATION
ON EARTH
AND 3 REASONS FOR HOPE
A recent poll reveals 32 per cent of Australians are “very worried” about US foreign policy. Here’s why:
- Nuclear Revivalism.
By expanding its stockpile of nuclear weapons and the ways it can
deliver warheads, the US is re-charging the arms race. Having
unexpectedly refused to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in
1999, the US is poised to resume nuclear testing. In 2002, George Bush
dumped the long standing Anti Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia and
revived the Reagan era nuclear program of national missile defence,
also known as “star wars”.
- Nuclear Treaty Violations. The
1968 Non Proliferation Treaty provides that states without nuclear
weapons must not acquire them and those that do must progressively
reduce stocks. The US has flouted this provision, while trying to stop
other nations from acquiring their own weapons. In addition, it is
cranking out a new generation of nuclear warheads.
- Nuclear Brinkmanship.
In 1994, the US reached an agreement with North Korea (the Framework
Arrangements) to provide parts and technical help for the country’s
nuclear power plants, which it failed to honour. This breach – plus the
nomination of North Korea as an agent of evil - has propelled Pyongyang
into strategy of nuclear brinkmanship. “We will continue to expand our
atomic forces”, it announced in April, for as long as the US “tries to
isolate and suffocate” Korea.
Meanwhile, the
Asian doomsday clock keeps ticking. India, Pakistan and China possess
the bomb, Iran is accused of seeking one of its own, and Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan are presumed to share the same intentions. On top of
this, the Pentagon’s list of nations targeted for possible nuclear
attack has lately been revised. It now includes five non nuclear weapon
states. (See Fact or Fission by Richard Bronoiwski, 2003)
- The militarisation of outer space, the “fourth dimension of warfare”.
According to documents on its websites, US Air Force Space Command is
developing nuclear warheads and versatile spacecraft that can strike
any target on earth within minutes. The aim is to create an
instantaneous global strike force, a range of exotic new weapons and
achieve “full spectrum combat dominance” in space. This includes
nuclear capability. The commander of Air Force Space Command (AFSC),
Gen. Lance W. Lord, is refreshingly frank: “We must protect and defend
our interests in space,” he told the 21st National Space Symposium in
September, sponsored by weapons giants Raytheon and Northrop Grumman,
“It’s critical to our security. Our nation depends on it”. Tactics
could include blowing up enemy satellites in the blackness beyond the
atmosphere. “Our message is clear. You can’t go to war and win without
space.” General Lord said America has completed the transition from a
nation interested in space to a nation with national interests in space.
In its Strategic Master Plan, published in October 2003, AFSC sets out
its vision for the next 25 years: “We will organize, train and equip
space and missile forces to provide the President with a range of
options to deter and defeat aggression or any form of coercion against
the US. Our charter is to rapidly obtain and maintain space superiority
and the nuclear, and conventional strike capabilities that produce
desired warfighting effects.”
However, the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, signed by the US, specifies that
harmful contamination of space and celestial bodies shall be avoided
and “states shall not place nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass
destruction in orbit or on celestial bodies or station them in outer
space in any other manner”. By 2011, according to its own documents,
AFSC intends to field “technologies that provide revolutionary
capabilities in communications, propulsion, conventional and nuclear
strike.” The hatching of this plan makes the United States the first
nation to break the 40 year global taboo against arming the heavens.
(Note: the quotes from the AFSC Master Plan are taken from the .pdf file still on its site in Feb 04, but since toned down. For a copy of the unrevised version, email me.
- Disregarding international laws, treaties and conventions, including those it has ratified.

A
senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, Ivo Dalder, puts it in a
nutshell: “America will use international institutions and abide by
international laws, when they advance its great mission. But it will
abandon institutions and ignore international laws when they constrain
its freedom to act”. (SMH April 9/05). Isn’t this the modus operandi of
a professional criminal? The US is currently in flagrant breach of the
Geneva Conventions and key articles of Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, (especially Article 5: No one shall be subject to torture or to
cruel or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment). In war zones,
the US ignores treaties relating to the use of weapons, the protection
of civilians, the rights of children and the obligation of occupying
forces to restore infrastructure and maintain security. The US
Military’s systemic disregard for treaties, laws and conventions,
include:
- The kidnapping of ‘suspects’ in foreign lands and removing them without due process to secret jails.
-
Holding such people in solitary isolation indefinitely and failing to
disclose their identities to the International Red Cross. The floating population of "ghost detainees", according to US and UK military officials, now exceeds 10,000.
- The outsourcing of torture.
- The insourcing of torture. (Even the Pentagon has admitted to over 100 deaths of those held in its own custody).
- The jailing of women & children, sometimes with the aim of “flushing out” a fugitive family member.
- The arrest and/or elimination of journalists, doctors, ambulance drivers and other witnesses of US operations.
 |
 |
In
the early stages of the Iraqi invasion, President Bush was asked for
his reaction to Iraqi TV footage of American POW’s, and he said he
expected them to be “treated humanely … just like we’re treating the
prisoners that we have captured humanely”. Bush promised that those who
mistreat prisoners “will be treated as war criminals”. Instead, his
senior officials who ordered, justified and condoned the torture of
prisoners - 90 per cent of whom were innocent, according to the
International Red Cross – have been rewarded with his “full support”
and promotions.
- Institutionalised cruelty.
The brutality of today’s US military is compounded by its culture of
implausible denial. On April 15/04, as the Abu Ghraib revelations were
starting to surface, the then US Assistant Secretary of State, Richard
Armitage, told a Washington press conference: “We are the most humane
military in the world. We punish our people when they exceed bounds,
and we do it transparently. We regret every single civilian life which
is lost”

This is odd, seeing there had been numerous confirmed reports of
families slaughtered at check points, bombed at outdoor markets and
exterminated at wedding parties (in both Iraq and Afghanistan). Even
today, three years after the US invasion, Iraqi children are dying
limbless in hospitals without aspirin. Civilians are still being beaten
and shot, sometimes while at prayer. Documents recently obtained – not
by the media - but by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),
include detailed accounts of brutal beatings, "exercise until
exhaustion," and sworn statements that soldiers were told to "beat the
f**k out of" Iraqis. According to the ACLU, “torture and abuse of
detainees in Iraq has been routine and such treatment was considered an
acceptable practice by U.S. forces”. Teenagers were beaten until their
jaws broke, often while blindfolded, zipcuffed or sandbagged. An
unknown number of prisoners died and were buried without autopsies.
Anal probes were routine. It was a military version of the Hellfire
Club. Iraqi scientists were tortured to reveal the whereabouts of
weapons of mass destruction, the absence of which was already known to
those who authorised the torture.
A secret network of US jails and military bases encircles the world, to
which hordes of hooded captives are ferried back and forth night and
day, rarely knowing where they are or what they’ve done. The hub of
this global gulag, according to The Guardian (19/ March/05) is
Afghanistan, “one huge jail”, where the country’s the human rights
commission has logged over 800 allegations of serious abuses committed
against detainees by US troops. The Guardian’s lengthy report makes
grim reading. Deaths during interrogation, improvised tortures, such as
naked prisoners chained to stone floors in icy conditions, unmarked
graves, and the enforcement of homosexual intercourse among the inmates
by female guards. According to Michael Posner, director of the US legal
watchdog, Human Rights First ,"The detention system in Afghanistan
exists entirely outside international norms, but it is only part of a far larger and more sinister jail network that we are only now beginning to understand,"
- A serial war criminal.
All cultures are shaped by their past, few more so than the US
military. In the Second World War, three months after the defeat of the
German army in May 1945, Europe was at peace and Japan was on the verge
of surrender. At this time, on August 6, US President Harry Truman
announced that an “American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima, an
important Japanese Army base”, though he was well aware the target was
a city of 400,000 inhabitants. Despite Truman’s pledge that the US
wanted to “avoid, as much as possible, the killing of civilians”, the
world’s first Atomic bomb was detonated without warning 600 meters
above the Shima hospital in the center of the city during morning rush
hour. Between a quarter and a half of its people were instantly
incinerated, and over a thousand died slow agonising deaths. However,
General Grove assured Congress that nuclear radiation caused “no undue
suffering – in fact, they say it is a very pleasant way to die”. (On
the eve of the Baghdad invasion George W Bush assured the world that
Iraqi civilians would be spared “in every way we can”). Three days
after bombing Hiroshima, the US dropped a nuclear bomb over the Roman
Catholic cathedral in Nagasaki, with incredible effect, but for no
apparent reason. The official July 1946 report on the Pacific air war
by the US Strategic Bombing Survey concluded: “Japan would have
surrendered even if Atomic bombs had not been dropped”.
The day before obliterating Nagasaki, the allies signed the London
Agreement, which made crimes against humanity punishable in an
international court. Awkwardly, the fourth Hague Convention of 1907,
had banned the bombardment of civilians. However, the American war
crimes prosecutor, Telford Taylor, decided that since air bombardment
had become a “recognised part of modern warfare”, such acts had become
“customary law”. As historian Sven Linqvist points out: rather than
ruling that the allies – “especially the allies” – had committed this
kind of war crime, “the American prosecutor declared the law had been
rendered invalid by the actions of the allies”. (See A History of
Bombing by Sven Lindqvist, Granta Books, London, 2001)
In 1963 President Eisenhower, the Allied commander in Europe during
World War II, recalled how he had opposed dropping the atomic bomb on
Japan. He told the Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, that he was against
it on two counts. “First, the Japanese were ready to surrender and it
wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Second, I hated to
see our country be the first to use such a weapon.” His gut reaction
was right. The chain reaction unleashed by the splitting of the atom,
has been replicated on earth by the chain reaction of nations
conspiring to acquire bomb. Should a nuclear bomb ever strike another
city, the responsibility will be rightly sourced to those who chose to
incinerate Hiroshima.

Aerial bombardment of civilians is still standard US practice, often
involving the use of weapons outlawed by the 1977 Geneva Protocols. The
US employed chemical weapons in Korea, napalm and Agent Orange in
Vietnam, depleted uranium in the first Gulf war, cluster bombs in
Kabul, vacuum bombs in Tora Bora, phosphorous bombs in Falluja and most
of the above various parts of the Iraq and Afghanistan. On the way are
nuclear tipped bunker busters. Taken all for all, despite the best
intentions of its citizens, the US Government has committed more acts
of airborne terror than all the other nations of earth put together.
- The infliction of childhood deformities.
The US Military continues to use depleted uranium (DU), both to armour
its tanks and strengthen its shells, despite its well documented
medical consequences. The soaring cancer, leukaemia and malignancy
rates that followed the first Gulf War have been linked to the use of
DU, and the weapon’s trail of radioactive dust can enter the food chain
through the soil and the water table. Exposure to DU can cause kidney
damage, cancers of lung and bone, neurocognitve disorders, chromosone
damage and birth defects. (See The New Nuclear Danger, Helen Caldacot,
2002). During the second siege of Falluja, DU shells were used to blast
through the dwellings of civilians.
Neither
mounting statistics of deformities, nor heartrending documentary images
of disfigured Iraqi babies, has altered Pentagon policy, despite the
risks to its own troops. The department of defence admitted in 1998
that its own investigation into the “potential health hazards of
uranium point to serious deficiencies of what our troops understand
about the health effect DU posed on the battlefield ”. A UN
subcommission on human rights has condemned uranium munitions as
weapons of indiscriminate destruction. What does this say about the
morality of a military which uses such weapons, knowing they are
capable of deforming the future unborn?
- The disinformation industry with a global reach.
This all started years ago as an acceptable, almost charming, culture
of exaggeration in advertising, tabloid journalism, PR, the movies,
etc, and has since blossomed into a full blown mindscape of
institutional distortion. So now the norm of civilised life in the 21st
Century is to navigate spin, lies, illusions, propaganda, “non core
promises” and “plausible denials”. Soon after the twin towers
collapsed, another sound could be heard across the US; the mass media
barons closing their minds. A typical outcome is the recent poll
showing 57 per cent of Americans still think Iraq had weapons of mass
destruction before the start of the war, while six in 10 say they still
believe Iraq provided direct support to al-Qaida.
“Americans believe these lies not because they are stupid”, notes Amy
Goodman, host of New York’s independent TV news show "Democracy Now,
“but because they are good media consumers. Our media have become an
echo chamber for those in power”. Instead of challenging the fraudulent
claims of the Bush administration, the US media have become a megaphone
for government propaganda, a cheer leader in the Terror Wars, a
sanitising filter of everyday horrors. Six huge corporations control
all the major media outlets. As Goodman points out, the lack of
diversity in ownership helps explain the lack of diversity in the news.
The difference between the April 1937 bombing of Guernica and the 2004
razing of Falluja, is that the latter was more bloody minded, lasted
much longer and has not yet produced a Picasso to capture the world’s
conscience. The Falluja attack began with US forces storming the
General Hospital, menacing doctors, dragging away patients, putting
snipers on the roof and blocking attempts to help the city’s wounded -
all in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions. And where was the
media? In bed with the marines, which is why they’re referred to on the
web as “presstitutes”.
Of the enormous numbers of women and children killed in Iraq since the
invasion, the media have taken it upon themselves to self censor the
images of human wreckage. Night after night our TV screens are filled
with images of actors getting sliced and diced, but the false God of
patriotism blocks the truth of what the world’s most expensive weapons
are doing to the people we claim to be liberating.

- Eating the planet. America
continues to act in its own self interest, regardless of the interest
of the world as a whole. While this may have been okay 50 years ago, it
is now the ethical equivalent of piracy. How can a country so
innovative in its use of technology, become so stuck in the Darwinian
swamp, when it comes lightening its earthly footprint? A landmark study
backed by 1,360 scientists from 95 countries, has recently warned that
almost two-thirds of the natural systems that support life are
“seriously degraded”. The consequence, according to the Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment Report, are imminent abrupt changes that will harm
humans, including the emergence of new diseases, sudden changes in
water quality, creation of “dead zones” along the coasts, the collapse of fisheries, and shifts in regional climate.
Like it or not, global survival depends on a mainstream mind-shift.
While this is understood by many US citizens, the White House is still
groping in the dark, dreaming of endless oil, space wars, and the
Return of Christ.
It is reminiscent of the era when the Vatican burnt alive those who
maintained the Earth was not the center of the universe. How long will
it take our leaders to realise the ground has again shifted, that
nature has no political borders, that fossil fuels are finite, the
weather is getting wilder, the consumer society is getting ridiculous,
and even the rich are depressed. Today’s mindshift is both
philosophical and practical, as we move away from a system based on
extraction to one of restoration; from a lifestyle of waste to one of
sustainability. This is the dawning of eco literacy; the emerging of a
whole earth awareness that will jolt nations to see themselves as
social units in a global family. A time when the national interest can
no longer subvert the wider interest of global renewal.
In such matters, everyday citizens are far ahead of those who govern in
their name. After the Boxing Day tsunamis, when both Canberra and the
White House made offers of financial help publicly condemned as
“stingy”, it was citizens who first emptied their wallets, shaming the
politicians into upping their offers and preening before the media, to
crow about their “generosity”, (which no truly generous person does.)
Since the tsunami devastations, it is high schools which have been
leading the way, with students and teachers from NSW raising over $1
million to date, in a spontaneous outburst of citizen diplomacy.
Washing its hands of Kyoto was a dumb move for America and Australia,
whatever the protocol’s shortcomings. This is a vital mechanism of
global co-operation. The American way of life is no longer not
negotiable. The solutions are blowing in the wind, rising with the
tide, soaring through solar panels. One day, shopping will cease to be
the primary source of human fulfilment.
3 REASONS TO BE CHEERFUL

- The
flair and persistence of domestic dissent. Despite its anaemic trickle
into the mainstream, free speech is alive and frothing in a myriad of
tributaries. On the net, in thoughtful glossies, at concerts, in cafes,
in Flash art, at public meetings, at poetry slams, in small town
newspapers, even on military blogs, in docos, in ginger-group emails
& on alternative radio and TV, such as the above mentioned
Democracy Now. Today’s alternative media thrive on foreign news
sources, which offer a counterpoint to the head-in-the-sand corporate
staples and, perhaps for the first time in decades, reveal the sad
standing in which the US Government is widely held. It was the web
audiences who first learned, via the surge of links to Der Spiegel,
that the first glimpse of the US President on the big screens at the
Pope’s funeral, was greeted with an outburst of “deafening” catcalls.
The blogs reap the reward of mainstream mendacity. From the first thud
of the war drums, radical bloggers ridiculed the official reasons for
invading Iraq and the manipulation of public hysteria. Long before
Colin Powell addressed the UN with his bogus charts and anthrax props,
such claims had been discredited. During the siege of Falluja, it was
the bloggers who linked to the street lined images of child corpses and
eye witness accounts of US atrocities, including the influential whatreallyhappened.com.
In April, Rupert Murdoch confessed he had been wrong about “this thing
called the digital revolution”, which didn’t “limp away”, as he hoped.
But now comes the scary bit. Murdoch plans to “grasps this huge
opportunity”, and expand his reach!
- The revival of Protest music. This had completely passed me by, until a tip-off from extreme blogger, John Kaminski.
Much of it is inspiring, embracing many genres, and every bit as
revolutionary as the soundtrack of the years spanning the Civil Rights
movement and the counter culture. The daughters of George Bush have
reportedly presented their dad with an I-Pod. Here are suggestions for
his playlist (all available online, if you know where to look):
Falluja, by David Rovics; What Would You Do, Sonic Jihad; Know Your
Enemy, Dead Prez; It’s a Rich Man’s War, Steve Earle; To Kill the
Child, Roger Waters; We Can’t Make it Here; James McMurtry; Self
Evident, Ani Di Franco; Bomb the World, Michael Franti, who sums it all
up: “We can bomb the world to pieces, but we can’t bomb it into peace.”
- The
growing legion of truth seekers. These are the freedom fighters of the
information age, the foot soldiers of the NGO’s, the anonymous
cyber-mice who ferret out and post “lost” Government documents, as well
as the few remaining investigative journalists who put truth telling
before flag waving, as well as - yes! – conspiracy theorists, maligned
by coincidence theorists and others partial to official sources. While
some “alternative” scenarios put forward to account for 9/11 seem
delusional, that doesn’t vindicate the version insisted upon by the
White House, or its hand picked commission, where George Bush &
Dick Cheney were allowed to testify in secret, together and not under
oath. The Bush administration received ‘dozens of urgent, credible
warnings that the attacks were coming’, including a Presidential Daily
Briefing of Aug. 6, 2001, entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in
U.S" , reporting "patterns of suspicious activity in this country
consistent with preparations for hijackings." Nothing was done. Even
today, it is still not known who really hijacked the planes. For more
on this, and numerous other anomalies, you may profit from a sceptical
tour of the waterfront with Steven T. Jones in the March 05 San Francisco Bay Guardian.
You might even agree that 9/11’s most bizarre conspiracy theory of all
is the one put forward by the White House. Anyway, thank God for free
speech, even in its diminished version, which is all that’s left
between us and Orwell’s 1984.
According to a recent US poll, almost 50% of New York City residents
believe “some U.S. officials knew in advance that attacks were planned
on or around 9/11/01 and that they consciously failed to act”, which
brings to mind the Reichstag fire. In the event, we may never know who
struck the first match, but the whole world will go on feeling the heat
for years to come. Thanks to the New Yorker, I have learned the 73rd
hexagram of the I-Ching is interpreted such: “Two towers fall. When
smoke fills people’s eyes, they can be led anywhere.” Only when the
Government and the media are returned to the people, will the smoke
will be blown away.
For more
|
Update 21 March 2005
Richard's writings

(image from The Guardian, 22 September 04)
Hotlinks
|